Gå til hovedindhold

EWCS 2010 - Methodology

General information

In an effort to provide comparable and reliable data on working conditions across Europe, Eurofound has developed a unified methodological approach and quality assurance system. Over the years, the methodology has been improved, new concerns have been integrated and the geographical scope has expanded with the enlargements of the European Union.

Fieldwork period January till June 2010
Contractor Gallup Europe (Belgium)
Coverage 27 EU Member States, Turkey, Croatia, the Former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia, Norway, Albania, Kosovo, and Montenegro
Target population The target population is all residents of the countries mentioned above, that were aged 15 or older (aged 16 or older in Spain, the UK and Norway), and that were in employment at the time of the survey. People were considered to be in employment if they had worked for pay or profit for at least an hour in the week preceding the interview (ILO definition).
Sample The basic sample is a multi-stage, stratified, random sample. Each country is divided into sections based on region and degree of urbanisation, in each of which a number of primary sampling units (PSU) is drawn randomly. Subsequently, a random sample of households is drawn in each PSU. Finally, in each household, the person chosen for interview is whoever is in the workforce and has his or her birthday next.
Sample size The target sample size in most countries was 1000. Exceptions were Germany and Turkey (target sample size of 2000), and Italy, Poland and the United Kingdom (target sample size 1500). Moreover, three countries decided to finance bigger national samples resulting in a target sample size of 4000 in Belgium, 3000 in France and 1400 in Slovenia. The total number of interviews in 2010 was 43 816.
Type of interview Face to face, at home (i.e. outside the workplace), average duration 44 minutes
Type of survey Questionnaire-based with interviews conducted face to face in people's homes in the national language(s) of the country

For more information please see the Technical report (in English only).

Sampling

The sample used in the European Working Conditions Survey is representative of those aged 15 years and over (16 and over in Spain, the UK and Norway) who are in employment and are resident in the country that is being surveyed. In each country, a multi-stage, stratified random sampling design was used.

In the first stage, primary sampling units (PSUs) were sampled, stratifying according to geographic regions (NUTS 2 level or below) and level of urbanisation. Subsequently, in each PSU households were sampled. In countries where an updated, high quality address or population register was available, this was used as the sampling frame. If such a register was not available a random route procedure was applied. In the 5th EWCS, for the first time, the enumeration of addresses through this random route procedure was separated from the interviewing stage. Finally, a screening procedure was applied to select the eligible respondent within each household.

The target number of interviews was 1,000 in all countries, except Slovenia (1,400), the UK, Italy and Poland (1,500), Germany and Turkey (2,000), France (3,000) and Belgium (4,000). The Slovenian, French and Belgian governments made use of the possibility offered by Eurofound to pay for an addition to the initial sample size. The number of interviews completed in each country is summarised in the following table.

Number of completed interviews:

Belgium

4001

Ireland

1003

Austria

1003

Croatia

1100

Bulgaria

1014

Italy

1500

Poland

1500

FYROM

1100

Czech Republic

1000

Cyprus

1000

Portugal

1000

Turkey

2100

Denmark

1069

Latvia

1001

Romania

1017

 

 

Germany

2133

Lithuania

1004

Slovenia

1404

Albania

1000

Estonia

1000

Luxembourg

1000

Slovakia

1002

Kosovo

1018

Greece

1037

Hungary

1006

Finland

1028

Montenegro

1041

Spain

1008

Malta

1000

Sweden

1004

 

 

France

3046

Netherlands

1017

UK

1575

Norway

1085

For further information, please see the Sampling implementation report.

Coding

The 5th EWCS included a few open questions, to record the respondents’ occupation and the economic activity of the organisation or company they work for. The answers were coded according to international classification systems for occupation (ISCO88 and ISCO08) and activity of companies and organisations (NACE Rev 1.1 and 2.0).

For both ISCO and NACE the answers were coded using both the current and the previous version of the classification system. The coding using the previous versions is needed to make comparisons with previous waves of the EWCS.

For the 5th EWCS, ISCO coding was carried out on the 4-digit level, allowing for very specific distinctions between occupations. One of the reasons for doing this was to enable an appropriate transition from the old ISCO classification to the most recent one.

These open questions were not the only ones to require coding. The question about the respondent’s level of education was recoded into ISCED categories, in order to make the country-specific education categories internationally comparable. Also, the income questions referred to the national currency in each country, which was afterwards converted into Euro according to the exchange rates at the time of conversion (01 March 2010).

For more information, please see the Coding report.

Weighting

As in previous waves of the EWCS three types of weights need to be applied to ensure that results based on the 5th EWCS data can be considered representative for workers in Europe.

  1. Selection probability weights
    Because of the way the sampling process is designed, people in households with fewer workers have a greater chance of being selected into the sample than people in households with more workers. For example, in a household with one person in employment, the probability of this person to be selected is 100%, whereas it drops to 50% for persons in a household with two people in employment. Selection probability weights (or design weights) are constructed to correct for this.
  2. Post-stratification weights
    Because of differences in the willingness and availability to participate in the survey certain groups are overrepresented and other groups are underrepresented in the EWCS sample. To ensure that the results accurately reflect the population of workers in each country post-stratification weighting is needed. The weights are calculated by comparing the EWCS to the Labour Force Survey (Eurostat) with regard to the gender, age, region, occupation and sector of economic activity of the respondents. 
  3. Supra-national weights
    The differences between countries in the size of their workforce, are not (fully) reflected in the sample size in each country. To ensure that larger countries weigh heavier in the EU level results, supra-national weights need to be applied when performing analyses on the European level.

Quality assurance

To ensure high quality of the 5th EWCS data each stage of the survey was carefully planned, closely monitored and documented, and specific controls were put in place. When compiling the draft questionnaire and planning the survey management, recommendations outlined in the Quality report of the 4th European working conditions survey for further improving the survey methodology as well as Eurofound’s experiences with previous surveys were taken into account.

Quality control mechanisms were included in the tender specifications to ensure the survey was implemented in accordance with ‘best practice’ and that each stage was documented in detail. The contractor for the 5th EWCS has compiled a Quality assurance report which provides a summary of the quality assurance activities performed during the survey preparation, fieldwork and data processing.

Finally, after the fieldwork an External quality assessment report took place to analyse the extent to which the quality criteria outlined in the European Statistical System (ESS) were met. It concluded that the 5th EWCS was based on a sound quality assurance framework and that notable improvements had been made compared to the previous wave, particularly with regard to questionnaire development and translation, sampling, data collection, and data processing. It commended the fact that process indicators were systematically monitored and recorded, both in real-time and after the fact, enabling users to make optimal use of the data as well as helping Eurofound to make further improvements in possible next waves of the survey.

The main problems identified in the assessment refer to the long data collection period, and the relatively low response rates in some countries; issues that need close attention should the survey be repeated.

Disclaimer

When freely submitting your request, you are consenting Eurofound in handling your personal data to reply to you. Your request will be handled in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. More information, please read the Data Protection Notice.