Industrial relations and social dialogue

Sociālo partneru iesaiste politikas veidošanā Covid-19 uzliesmojuma laikā

Report
Publicēts
9 Marts 2021
pdf
Formats and languages
Executive summary in 22 languages
Lejuplādēt
Autors(-i): 
Rodriguez Contreras, Ricardo

Būtiskākie secinājumi

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged national social dialogue and impacted on the existing frameworks and practices for the involvement of social partners in policymaking.
    Share
Read more
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged national social dialogue and impacted on the existing frameworks and practices for the involvement of social partners in policymaking.
    Share
  • Time pressure in terms of consultation and engagement during this period is considered to be the main issue in the quality of social dialogue and, as a result, the involvement of social partners.
    Share
  • In general, social partners recognise the exceptional circumstances and constraints imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted the standard involvement frameworks and institutions in place; however, social partners take the view that the majority of governments could have done much better in this area.
    Share
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has shown that, where tripartite social dialogue is well established and permanent, the impact of the health crisis on the involvement of the social partners has been relatively limited.
    Share
  • By contrast, in many other countries, although social dialogue remained in place, it was severely restricted. In this regard, the health crisis has revealed the structural weaknesses of the social dialogue foundation in some industrial relations systems.
    Share
Read less

Kopsavilkums

Kopš 2016. gada Eurofound ir cieši uzraudzījis valstu sociālo partneru iesaisti politikas veidošanā Eiropas pusgada cikla ietvaros. 2020. gadā galvenā uzmanība tika pievērsta to iesaistei Covid-19 uzliesmojuma pirmajos mēnešos. Lai gan pandēmija ir radījusi milzīgu izaicinājumu sociālajam dialogaRead more

Kopš 2016. gada Eurofound ir cieši uzraudzījis valstu sociālo partneru iesaisti politikas veidošanā Eiropas pusgada cikla ietvaros. 2020. gadā galvenā uzmanība tika pievērsta to iesaistei Covid-19 uzliesmojuma pirmajos mēnešos. Lai gan pandēmija ir radījusi milzīgu izaicinājumu sociālajam dialogam, analīzes rezultāti norāda uz to, kā sociālais dialogs var būt efektīvs instruments politikas iniciatīvu izstrādē un risinājumu rašanā ārkārtas situācijās, kas skar uzņēmumus, darba ņēmējus, ekonomiku un sabiedrību. Ir skaidrs, ka sociālo partneru iesaistei nacionālo atveseļošanas un noturības plānu izstrādē un īstenošanā 2021. gadā būs izšķiroša nozīme atveseļošanas procesā un turpmākā sociālā dialoga stiprināšanā. 

Read less

Formats and languages

  • Ziņojums

    Lappušu skaits: 
    58
    Atsauces Nr.: 
    EF20035
    ISBN: 
    978-92-897-2161-5
    Kataloga Nr.: 
    TJ-02-21-103-EN-N
    DOI: 
    10.2806/993157
    Permalink: 
    eurofound.link/ef20035
    Catalogue info

    Sociālo partneru iesaiste politikas veidošanā Covid-19 uzliesmojuma laikā

    Autors(-i): 
    Rodriguez Contreras, Ricardo
    Topics: 
    Sociālais dialogs; Social partners; Agreements; COVID-19; Darba attiecības un sociālais dialogs

    Formāti

    Citēt šo publikāciju: 

    Eurofound (2021), Involvement of social partners in policymaking during the COVID-19 outbreak, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. 

  • Executive summary

    Atsauces Nr.: 
    EF20035EN1
    Catalogue info

    Sociālo partneru iesaiste politikas veidošanā Covid-19 uzliesmojuma laikā

    Autors(-i): 
    Eurofound

    Pieejams lejupielādei 22 valodās

    Lejuplādēt

  • Tables and graphs

    List of tables

    • Table 1: Extraordinary powers adopted to control the pandemic in Member States
    • Table 2: Satisfaction in the involvement of the social partners in policymaking during the first months of the COVID-19 outbreak
    • Table 3: Number of selected measures by category
    • Table 4: Income protection beyond short-time work – Views of social partners
    • Table 5: Employment protection and retention – Views of social partners
    • Table 6: Supporting business to stay afloat – Views of social partners
    • Table 7: Degree of satisfaction with the appropriateness of the institutional settings for effective involvement
    • Table 8: Time allotted for consultation
    • Table 9: Feedback and exchange of views
    • Table 10: Visibility of social partners’ views
    • Table 11: Quality of the processes for social partners’ involvement in NRPs
    • Table 12: Degree of influence of the social partners’ views on 2020 NRPs
    • Table 13: Social partners’ views regarding the social and labour contents of 2020 NRPs
    • Table 14: Social partners’ views regarding the social and labour contents of 2020 CSRs

    Figure

    • Figure 1: Form of involvement of social partners in the design of policy measures to cushion the socioeconomic impact of the crisis (%) 
       

Pētījumi, kas veikti pirms Apvienotās Karalistes izstāšanās no Eiropas Savienības 2020. gada 31. janvārī un pēc tam publicēti, var ietvert datus par 28 ES dalībvalstīm. Pēc šā datuma pētījumos ņem vērā tikai 27 ES dalībvalstis (ES 28 bez Apvienotās Karalistes), ja vien nav norādīts citādi.

Part of the series

  • National social partners and policymaking

    This series reports on and updates latest information on the involvement of national social partners in policymaking. The series analyses the involvement of national social partners in the implementation of policy reforms within the framework of social dialogue practices, including their involvement in elaborating the National Reform Programmes (NRPs).

Useful? Interesting? Tell us what you think. Hide comments

Pievienot komentāru