What makes capital cities the best places to live?
- 27 January 2020
- Download full reportPDF
- In Europe, people living in the capital city generally have a better quality of life than people living in other parts of a country. On this basis, it seems that capital cities are indeed the best places to live.
- For most countries, residents of the capital city score higher on life satisfaction on average than people living outside the capital.
- Life satisfaction in a capital city for the most part is closer to the national average than to the averages of other capital cities. This finding suggests that, despite concerns that capitals increasingly operate independently of their nations, national-level factors are still important in shaping differences in well-being both between countries and between capital cities.
- Capital cities have, by and large, larger proportions of people who report feeling resilient – able to cope during times of hardship – compared to other urban centres and rural regions in the same country. Some characteristics of city populations – such as a younger age profile and higher educational attainment – contribute to resilience, while others, such as housing insecurity, erode it. The findings suggest that some other latent factor, possibly related to opportunities for economic advancement and improving one’s living standards, could underlie the extra resilience that capital cities provide.
- Capital city residents tend to be more satisfied with how democracy works in their country compared to the population outside the capital. This difference is largely associated with socioeconomic background, which on average is more advantageous in capital cities. Capital city residents also tend to have greater trust in national institutions and be more critical of local or municipal authorities than people in the rest of the country.
Quality of life data show that in most countries, the capital city has advantages compared to the regions outside the capital. In light of the continued growth of capital city populations and the concentration of resources within them, this policy brief explores the source of the advantages of capital cities in quality of life. Are these advantages mostly related to specific demographics that these cities nurture and attract? Or do these advantages stem from opportunities that major cities provide due to their scale and economic growth?
The policy brief aims to clarify why policy should focus on both the economy and society when it comes to advancing economic, social and territorial cohesion.
Full reportNumber of Pages:28Reference No:EF18025ISBN:978-92-897-2048-9Catalogue:TJ-AR-20-001-EN-CDOI:10.2806/70479Topics:Quality of society; Quality of life and quality of society; Quality of life and public services; Public services; Subjective well-being; Living conditionsCite this publication as:Eurofound (2020), What makes capital cities the best places to live?, European Quality of Life Survey 2016 series, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Tables and graphs
- Table 1: Selected indicators of quality of life – Capital cities and rest of country compared, 2016
- Figure 1: Life satisfaction scores: Capital cities compared to the rest of the country, 2016
- Figure 2: Low resilience (%): Capital cities compared to the rest of the country, 2016
- Figure 3: Factors behind likelihood of low resilience
- Figure 4: Satisfaction with democracy: Capital cities compared to the rest of the country, 2016
- Figure 5: Trust in national institutions and local authorities: Capital cities, other urban areas and rural areas compared, 2016
- Figure 6: Factors affecting satisfaction with democracy
- Figure 7: Factors affecting average rating of quality of public services
- Figure 8: Average daily commuting time (minutes): Capital cities compared to the rest of the country, 2016
- Figure 9: Housing insecurity (%): Capital cities compared to the rest of the country, 2016
Part of the series
Carried out every four years, this unique, pan-European European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS) examines both the objective circumstances of European citizens' lives and how they feel about those circumstances and their lives in general. This series consists of outputs from the 2016 edition of the EQLS.