Representation in crowdwork and gigwork: Initiatives for regulating platform work in Germany (Interessenvertretung bei Crowd- und Gigwork - Initiativen zur Regulierung von Plattformarbeit in Deutschland)

The key findings of this paper:
- The platform economy breaks with traditional organizational forms of work and goes hand in hand with atypical forms of employment - crowdwork and gigwork;
- Platforms make it difficult to set up collective representation structures because they lack the operational structures and thus the co-presence and direct communication between employees;
- Nonetheless, there are initiatives by employees and unions to establish lobbying structures in the platform economy;
- Platforms prove to be difficult to develop representation because of the resistance of companies, but also because of the accessibility of employees. Trade unions must therefore weigh the costs and benefits of their initiatives;
- Gigwork and the local bondage of services favor bottom-up initiatives of employees

Haipeter, T. and Hoose, F. (2019). Interessenvertretung bei Crowd- und Gigwork. Initiativen zur Regulierung von Plattformarbeit in Deutschland. Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation (IAQ), University of Duisburg Essen.

Metadata

  • Germany
  • 2019
  • Research publication
  • platform characteristics, representation, industrial relations, social dialogue
  • German
  • Qualitative research
  • Open access
Disclaimer  —  Eurofound aims to keep the information in this database up to date and accurate. If errors are brought to our attention, we will try to correct them. However, Eurofound bears no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to the accuracy or content of this database or of external links over which Eurofound services have no control and for which Eurofound assumes no responsibility.