Salta al contenuto principale
Abstract

Le tecnologie digitali hanno permesso a molti lavoratori di svolgere il proprio lavoro in qualsiasi momento e in ogni luogo, con conseguenti vantaggi e svantaggi. I dati di Eurofound mostrano che i telelavoratori hanno il doppio delle probabilità di superare il limite di 48 ore di lavoro, di riposare in modo insufficiente e di lavorare nel tempo libero, con effetti a catena sulla loro salute fisica e mentale. Per affrontare questo problema, vi sono stati appelli per un «diritto alla disconnessione». La presente relazione si basa su studi di casi che tengono traccia dell’attuazione e dell’impatto del diritto alla disconnessione a livello di luogo di lavoro. Si basa su una precedente ricerca di Eurofound che mostra un aumento dei contratti collettivi che prevedono un diritto alla disconnessione nei paesi che hanno sancito questo diritto nella loro legislazione. Con la crescita esponenziale del telelavoro causata dalla pandemia di COVID-19, l’importanza di trovare un migliore equilibrio tra le opportunità e le sfide associate al telelavoro e al lavoro flessibile basato sulle TIC è diventata più rilevante che mai.

Key findings

Home-based teleworkers are twice as likely to exceed the 48-hour working time limit as workers onsite and are significantly more likely to work in their free time. Following the shift to telework during the pandemic, this is likely to lead to more hybrid working arrangements in the future, putting the spotlight on whether existing labour legislation is fit for purpose.

The experience of the first four Member States that have introduced rules and agreements on the right to disconnect prior to 2021 has demonstrated the pivotal role of the social partners in ensuring these rules are translated into reality on the ground. In countries with weaker industrial relations, legislation can provide a fallback option to ensure minimum standards are met.

The introduction of the right to disconnect in companies has revealed that a ‘soft’ approach through awareness raising, training and the management of out of hours connection is more common than a ‘hard disconnection’, which severs access to company communication during specific times.

New agreements and texts addressing the right to disconnect will need to consider the issues that lead to the ‘perceived’ need for constant connection, such as workload, lack of training and work processes that feed overconnection. High-level buy-in and regular reinforcement of the message on the importance of the right to disconnect will be critical for its success.

Although evidence of the impact of the right to disconnect on employee health and well-being, work–life balance, gender equality and company performance is lacking, social partners’ experiences at company level suggest that positive changes in company culture are taking place following the introduction of the right to disconnect.

The report contains the following lists of tables and figures.

List of tables

Table 1: Main opportunities and risks of ICT-based mobile work for work and employment

Table 2: Reasons for an absence of debate on the right to disconnect, mid-2020

Table 3: Case study companies and dates of texts containing the right to disconnect

Table 4: Dates, titles, nature, signatories, scope and coverage of the texts analysed

Table 5: Modalities and key features of connection and disconnection

Table 6: Main approaches to monitoring used by case study companies

Table 7: Qualitative and quantitative evidence gathered on implementation and impact of the right to disconnect

List of figures

Figure 1: Teleworking during the pandemic, July 2020 (%)

Figure 2: Share of employees in different ICT-based flexible arrangements working in their free time daily or weekly, 2015 (%)

Figure 3: Experience of teleworking and working hours during the COVID-19 pandemic, July 2020 (%)

Figure 4: Share of emails received outside of regular working hours that were addressed immediately (%)

Figure 5: Preferences regarding telework post pandemic by teleworking status, July 2020 (%)

Figure 6: Right to disconnect and status of legislation and debate in EU Member States, mid-2021

Figure 7: Key elements of hard and soft approaches to disconnection

Number of pages
70
Reference nº
EF21049
ISBN
978-92-897-2186-8
Catalogue nº
TJ-05-21-238-EN-N
DOI
10.2806/748556
Permalink

Cite this publication

Disclaimer

When freely submitting your request, you are consenting Eurofound in handling your personal data to reply to you. Your request will be handled in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. More information, please read the Data Protection Notice.