Skip to main content
Abstract

Since 2016, Eurofound has closely monitored the involvement of national social partners in policymaking as part of the European Semester cycle. In 2020, the focus was on their involvement during the first months of the COVID-19 outbreak. While the pandemic has presented a huge challenge to social dialogue, the results of the analysis highlight how social dialogue can be an effective tool in shaping policy initiatives and finding solutions to emergency situations affecting businesses, workers, the economy and society. It is clear that the participation of social partners in the design and implementation of national recovery and resilience plans in 2021 will be key in the recovery process and for strengthening social dialogue going forward.

Key findings

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged national social dialogue and impacted on the existing frameworks and practices for the involvement of social partners in policymaking.

Time pressure in terms of consultation and engagement during this period is considered to be the main issue in the quality of social dialogue and, as a result, the involvement of social partners.

In general, social partners recognise the exceptional circumstances and constraints imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted the standard involvement frameworks and institutions in place; however, social partners take the view that the majority of governments could have done much better in this area.

The COVID-19 pandemic has shown that, where tripartite social dialogue is well established and permanent, the impact of the health crisis on the involvement of the social partners has been relatively limited.

By contrast, in many other countries, although social dialogue remained in place, it was severely restricted. In this regard, the health crisis has revealed the structural weaknesses of the social dialogue foundation in some industrial relations systems.

List of tables

  • Table 1: Extraordinary powers adopted to control the pandemic in Member States
  • Table 2: Satisfaction in the involvement of the social partners in policymaking during the first months of the COVID-19 outbreak
  • Table 3: Number of selected measures by category
  • Table 4: Income protection beyond short-time work – Views of social partners
  • Table 5: Employment protection and retention – Views of social partners
  • Table 6: Supporting business to stay afloat – Views of social partners
  • Table 7: Degree of satisfaction with the appropriateness of the institutional settings for effective involvement
  • Table 8: Time allotted for consultation
  • Table 9: Feedback and exchange of views
  • Table 10: Visibility of social partners’ views
  • Table 11: Quality of the processes for social partners’ involvement in NRPs
  • Table 12: Degree of influence of the social partners’ views on 2020 NRPs
  • Table 13: Social partners’ views regarding the social and labour contents of 2020 NRPs
  • Table 14: Social partners’ views regarding the social and labour contents of 2020 CSRs

Figure

  • Figure 1: Form of involvement of social partners in the design of policy measures to cushion the socioeconomic impact of the crisis (%) 
     
Number of pages
58
Reference nº
EF20035
ISBN
978-92-897-2161-5
Catalogue nº
TJ-02-21-103-EN-N
DOI
10.2806/993157
Permalink

Cite this publication

Disclaimer

When freely submitting your request, you are consenting Eurofound in handling your personal data to reply to you. Your request will be handled in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data. More information, please read the Data Protection Notice.