Collective bargaining in Portugal: renewal through continuity?
Published: 27 January 1999
The latest official figures on formal and largely sector-level collective bargaining in Portugal, covering 1998, show continued stability from year to year. However, there are also informal negotiations which take place at company level, a notable example of which is a recent agreement at Autoeuropa, an important motor manufacturing company, which came into force in January 1999. The deal highlights some unresolved issues in the debate on collective bargaining, such as the representativeness of the parties involved and the normative effects of the agreements produced.
Download article in original language : PT9901123FPT.DOC
The latest official figures on formal and largely sector-level collective bargaining in Portugal, covering 1998, show continued stability from year to year. However, there are also informal negotiations which take place at company level, a notable example of which is a recent agreement at Autoeuropa, an important motor manufacturing company, which came into force in January 1999. The deal highlights some unresolved issues in the debate on collective bargaining, such as the representativeness of the parties involved and the normative effects of the agreements produced.
Collective bargaining in 1998
According to official figures from the Ministry of Labour and Solidarity (MTS), 393 collective agreements were recorded in Portugal in in 1998, slightly fewer than the 409 reported in the previous year (PT9802164F). There has been marked consistency in the numbers of collective agreements concluded over the past few years. Of the 1998 agreements, about 67.2% were sectoral agreements (68% in 1997), and 27.2% were company-level agreements (26.4 in 1997). "Adoption agreements" - whereby social partners in one area adopt agreements already negotiated elsewhere - comprised about 5.5% of the total in both years.
An analysis of 313 of the 1998 collective agreements (those concluded in three quarters of the year) reveals:
a centralisation of bargaining, with about 67% of agreements negotiated at national level. If "multi-district" agreements are included, the percentage rises to 87%;
a high concentration of agreements in industry, which represents 50.1% of the total, as compared with 18.3% in the commerce and the hotel sectors and 7.0% in transportation (the 1997 percentages were 48.4%, 15.4% and 13.9% respectively);
a particular prevalence of company-level agreements in transportation, accounting for 82.6% of agreements in that sector. The proportion of company-level agreements drops to around one-fourth of all agreements in industry and to only 18.3% in commerce and hotels; and
the fact that the influence of the two main trade union confederations in collective bargaining matters is fairly evenly balanced, with around 45% of the agreements being negotiated by the General Confederation of Portuguese Workers (Confederação Geral dos Trabalhadores Portugueses, CGTP), 40.6% by the General Workers' Union (União Geral de Trabalhadores, UGT) and 15% by the two working in conjunction. Only 3% of agreements were negotiated by independent unions.
The table below summarises the bargaining figures for 1997 and 1998.
| 1997 | 1998 | |
|---|---|---|
| Collective agreements (No.) | 409 | 393 |
| Sectoral agreements (% of total) | 68% | 67.2% |
| Multi-employer agreements and company-level agreements (% of total) | 26.4% | 27.2% |
| Adoption agreements (% of total) | 5.5% | 5.6% |
Source: Relatórios trimestrais, Direcção Geral das Condições de Trabalho, MTS.
There was some innovation in the contents of agreements negotiated in 1998: 36.3% covered non-pecuniary matters, while in the previous year only 15.8% had done so. Length of working time was the non-wage issue most often negotiated, featuring in 16.1% of the 328 non-pecuniary clauses analysed. The organisation of working time was also frequently mentioned (7.6%), while part-time work came up in only eight of the 328 cases. However, a closer look reveals that the degree of innovation in content is very limited, often repeating provisions already laid down by law.
Negotiations at Autoeuropa
The above figures refer to formal, institutionalised collective bargaining. However, in Portugal, bargaining can also occur within companies in an informal manner (PT9802165F), as the example of Autoeuropa shows.
Autoeuropa, one of Portugal's main firms in the motor manufacturing sector, was formed as a joint venture between Ford and Volkswagen, though Volkswagen has recently acquired the Ford part. The automobile industry carries a lot of weight in terms of the number of workers involved and of Portuguese industrial strategies, particularly acting as a stimulus for small and medium-sized companies. Much of the innovation in work organisation has come out of this industry, as well as some innovation in collective bargaining itself. There is a sectoral collective agreement that covers both automobile production and sales but an agreement negotiated informally by Autoeuropa management and the workers' commission came into effect in the company in January 1999. Autoeuropa has been negotiating informal agreements internally since 1994 but, according to the company, this year's agreement includes some new features:
recognition of the principle of flexibility as a fundamental modus operandi for the company's operations. Flexibility of working time was increased considerably;
pay increases based on performance, but differentiated in order to reduce differentials (4% for less skilled operators and 3.5% for others);
bonuses based on achievement of collective results (based on financial and quality-related company objectives) or individual results (based on attendance, housekeeping, quality of production, compliance with safety regulations and continuous improvement). These bonuses, similar to profit-sharing, will never amount to less than PTE 150,000 per year (2.4 times the monthly rate of the national minimum wage); and
extra paid holidays.
The deal was ratified by the workers' commission in a plenary session with the knowledge and acceptance of the individual trade unions concerned and both union confederations.
According to the company, such agreements have both positive and negative features:
this type of accord tends not to go beyond the level of a non-binding understanding with no legal effect, because workers' commissions are denied the right to negotiate on pay;
on the other hand, such agreements permit companies to negotiate important issues that may change from year to year.
matters negotiated at the company level are dealt with more comprehensively because the workers know what is acceptable and what is convenient in their particular work situation; and
sector-level negotiations are more difficult, especially when a sector is very large or includes branches with widely disparate activities. This makes it impossible to deal with issues that do not affect all parties. Sectoral bargaining is subject to political pressures to a greater degree than company-level bargaining. Trade-offs must be made in negotiations, making it more difficult to arrive at anything new.
Commentary
Several issues are relevant to the current bargaining situation, as outlined above, including:
the impact of negotiations at the level of national strategic concertation. The current 1996-9 Strategic Concertation Pact (Acordo de Concertação Estratégica, ACE) (PT9808190F) and the present intense debate on labour legislation may end up diluting the impact of more traditional and institutionalised forms of bargaining, such as sector-level bargaining, although the effects may vary from one sector to another; and
the increase in less stable forms of employment and a decrease in the unemployment rate (to 4.7%, according to national figures). Collective bargaining is directed primarily at the standard employment relationship, but obtaining and keeping a secure job is a goal that seems increasingly out of reach for the average Portuguese worker.
The main concern of the social partners, especially the unions, seems to be to deal with problematic situations in bargaining as they come up. However, these clash with the legal system, because informal company-level negotiations are being conducted where the representativeness of parties involved in the negotiation as well as the legal efficacy of the agreements are called into question. (Maria Luisa Cristovam, UAL)
Eurofound recommends citing this publication in the following way.
Eurofound (1999), Collective bargaining in Portugal: renewal through continuity?, article.