Article

New agreement clarifies organisational responsibilities between DGB affiliates

Published: 27 December 2000

At the beginning of November 2000, the trade unions affiliated to the German Federation of Trade Unions (Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund, DGB) and the German White-Collar Union (Deutsche Angestelltengewerkschaft, DAG) agreed on new principles [1] for the process of cooperation amongst DGB-affiliated unions after the foundation in spring 2001 of the new United Service Sector Union (Vereinigte Dienstleistungsgewerkschaft, Ver.di) (DE0012295N [2]) and the consequent integration of DAG into DGB. In order to avoid competition between trade unions, the new agreement aims to clarify the responsibility for organising particular sectors and companies of the various DGB affiliates, in particular within newly established sectors such as telecommunications, information technology and media and culture. After the DGB federal executive confirmed the agreement on 7 November 2000, the document was officially signed by the presidents of DGB and DAG on 5 December.[1] http://www.dgb.de/idaten/orga-grund.pdf[2] www.eurofound.europa.eu/ef/observatories/eurwork/articles/dag-dpg-and-hbv-delegates-support-foundation-of-unified-service-sector-union

In November 2000, the German Federation of Trade Unions (DGB) and the German White-Collar Union (DAG) reached an agreement on guidelines for cooperation between DGB-affiliated unions after the forthcoming establishment of a new Unified Service Sector Union (Ver.di) and the consequent integration of DAG into DGB. The deal seeks to clarify the responsibility for organising particular sectors and companies between DGB affiliates, in particular in "new" sectors such as telecommunications, information technology and media and culture.

At the beginning of November 2000, the trade unions affiliated to the German Federation of Trade Unions (Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund, DGB) and the German White-Collar Union (Deutsche Angestelltengewerkschaft, DAG) agreed on new principles for the process of cooperation amongst DGB-affiliated unions after the foundation in spring 2001 of the new United Service Sector Union (Vereinigte Dienstleistungsgewerkschaft, Ver.di) (DE0012295N) and the consequent integration of DAG into DGB. In order to avoid competition between trade unions, the new agreement aims to clarify the responsibility for organising particular sectors and companies of the various DGB affiliates, in particular within newly established sectors such as telecommunications, information technology and media and culture. After the DGB federal executive confirmed the agreement on 7 November 2000, the document was officially signed by the presidents of DGB and DAG on 5 December.

Principles on organisational responsibility

In the preamble to the new agreement, DGB confirms the principle of the unified trade union (Einheitsgewerkschaft) which has been the basic organisational principle of German trade unions since their reorganisation after the second world war (DE9910116F). The principle of unified trade unions means that DGB should be a common union organisation for all employees, independent of their political and religious beliefs and their occupational status. Since DGB is organised on a federal basis as a peak organisation of autonomous sectoral unions, the unified trade union principle has another core element - the principle of having only one union in each company in order to avoid competition between unions at the workplace. Moreover, given Germany's system of sectoral collective bargaining, there should usually be only one union which is responsible for negotiating the sectoral agreement.

In recent years, however, the principle of having only one union per company and sector has become more and more undermined as a result of structural changes in the economy, which have broken down the traditional sectoral demarcations and thereby brought into question the traditional sectoral boundaries of organisational responsibility between DGB affiliates. The problem is of particular importance in newly established sectors. With companies in various traditional sectors diversifying their activities into these new sectors, different sectoral trade unions have simultaneously gained responsibility in these new sectors.

The new DGB organisation agreement states that the unions want to continue with the principle of having only one union per company. Deviations from this principle should be allowed only in isolated cases and for a limited period of time. In companies whose employees are currently represented by more than one union, there should be an agreement between the unions involved in order to give full organisational and collective bargaining responsibility to a single union. DGB should create a register of companies and the trade unions responsible for them. In the event that the sectoral unions are not able to reach an agreement, DGB should start an arbitration process on the basis of established guidelines. In any case, it is forbidden for a DGB affiliate to recruit members in a company which falls under the organisational responsibility of another DGB affiliate.

If more than one DGB-affiliated union has organisational and collective bargaining responsibilities in a particular sector, all the trade unions involved should create a sectoral working group (Branchenarbeitskreis) and choose one union as the coordinating union for that sector. The latter should coordinate the activities of the sectoral working group and organise joint collective bargaining committees.

Organisational responsibilities in newly established sectors

Since the problem of trade union competition has become most obvious in newly established sectors, the DGB organisation agreement includes special provisions and guidelines for:

  • telecommunications;

  • information technology; and

  • media and culture.

Telecommunications

Following the liberalisation of the telecommunications market, as well as the development of technological innovations (such as mobile phones), Germany saw the emergence of various new telecommunications companies during the 1990s. Many of these companies originally belonged to traditional industrial companies which diversified their activities into telecommunications. In those cases, the trade union responsible for the parent company also often automatically became the responsible trade union for the telecommunications company. In many cases, these trade unions were able to conclude company agreements, which led to a rather fragmented collective agreement structure in telecommunications - see table 1 below. In addition, there are also a significant number of telecommunications companies which have no trade union representation and are not covered by a collective agreement.

Table 1. Selected company agreements in telecommunications
Responsible trade union Companies
Transnet Mannesmann Arcor AG & Co, DB Dialog GmbH
Public Services, Transport and Traffic Union (Gewerkschaft Öffentliche Dienste, Transport und Verkehr, ÖTV) BeisNet Telekommunikation- und Carrierdienste GmbH, Corporate Network Gesellschaft für Telekommunikation mbH, DOKOM Gesellschaf für Telekommunikation mbH, KomTel Gesellschaft für Kommunikation- und Information, NetCologne GmbH, VEW TELNET Gesellschaft für Telekommunikation und Netzdienste GmbH, Wiesbadener Informations- und Telekommunikations GmbH (WiTCOM)
Chemicals, Energy and Mining Union (Industriegewerkschaft Bergbau Chemie Energie, IG BCE) Envi.tel GmbH*, VEAGCOM Telekommunikationsgesellschaft mbH, VIAG Interkom GmbH & Co
Metalworkers' Union (IG Metall) D 2 Mannesmann Mobilfunk*
Postal Workers' Union (Deutsche Postgewerkschaft, DPG) Deutsche Telekom MobilNet GmbH (T-Mobil)

* Currently under negotiation.

Source: WSI Collective Agreement Archive 2000.

For telecommunications, the DGB organisation agreement includes the following provisions:

  • telecommunications service companies, such as mobile or fixed-line communications, call centres, internet providers and online-services, should fall within the organisational responsibility of Ver.di;

  • telecommunications service companies which are an integrated part of another company and work mainly for that company should fall within the organisational responsibility of the union which is also responsible for the parent company;

  • telecommunications companies which produce telecommunications equipment and related software, as well as the service departments of those companies, should fall within the organisational responsibility of the IG Metall metalworkers' union; and

  • Ver.di should become the coordinating union for telecommunications.

Furthermore, the agreement states that in any case the organisational responsibility for D 2 Mannesmann Mobilfunk will remain with IG Metall and the organisational responsibility for VIAG Interkom will remain with the IG BCE mining, chemicals and energy union.

Information technology

The information technology (IT) sector is also one of the fastest-growing sectors in Germany. Similar to telecommunications, many IT companies originally belonged to traditional industrial companies which diversified their activities into the IT sector. In those cases, the trade union responsible for the parent company also often automatically became the responsible union for the IT company. In many cases, the responsible trade unions were able to conclude company agreements which again led to a rather fragmented collective agreement structure in the IT sector - see table 2. There are also a very few IT companies which are covered by the sectoral collective agreement for metalworking. A relatively high number of IT companies, however, have no trade union representation and are not covered by a collective agreement.

Table 2. Selected company agreements in information technology
Responsible trade union Companies
IG BCE CDA Datenträger Albrechts GmbH, RAG Informatik GmbH
IG BCE/Construction Workers' Union (IG Bau-Agrar-Umwelt, IG BAU) Informationsverarbeitungs- und Service GmbH (IVS)
IG Metall Bull**, Compaq**, Ditec**, IBM Speichersysteme**, IT subsidies of Siemens**, Debis (DE9803257F), Infineon Technologies, SINITEC
IG Metall/DAG IBM-Informationssysteme
HBV AVN Apotheken-Verrechnungsstelle Dr Carl Carstens GmbH, Apothekenrechenzentrum Brandenburg GmbH, AZH GmbH, DATAKOM Gesellschaft für Datenverarbeitung und Kommunikation mbH, Datenverarbeitungszentrum Suhl GmbH, Datenverarbeitungszentrum Halle, Tarifgemeinschaft FIDUCIA Konzern- und Beteiligungsgesellschaften, Rechenzentrale Bayerischer Genossenschaften eG, Rechenzentrum nordrhein-westfälicher Apotheken AG
DPG DeTeCard GmbH, Deutsche Telekom Computer Service Management GmbH (DeTeCSM), Gesellschaft für Datenkommunikation (T-Data), Postbank Data GmbH
HBV/DAG Genossenschaftsrechenzentrale Norddeutschland GmbH (GRZ)
DAG Xerox*
ÖTV/DAG Daten- und Informationszentrum Rheinland-Pfalz, AöR

* Currently under negotiation; ** Covered by the sectoral collective agreement for metalworking.

Source: WSI Collective Agreement Archive 2000.

Fro the IT sector, the DGB organisation agreement includes the following provisions:

  • IT companies which mainly produce IT hardware should fall within the organisational responsibility of IG Metall;

  • IT companies which originally produced IT hardware but have diversified into software production and IT services should all within the organisational responsibility of IG Metall;

  • IT companies which mainly produce software and provide IT services should fall within the organisational responsibility of Ver.di;

  • IT companies which produce software and provide IT services for the internal use of a company should fall within the organisational responsibility of the union which is also responsible for the parent company; and

  • IG Metall should become the coordinating union for the IT sector.

Media and culture

Concerning the media and culture sector, the DGB organisation agreement includes the following provisions:

  • service companies in the media and culture sector, such as publishers, television and radio stations and film and video producers, should fall within the organisational responsibility of Ver.di;

  • companies which produce and distribute data media (CD s, discs, cassettes etc), photo-chemicals and photo material should fall within the organisational responsibility of IG BCE; and

  • Ver.di should become the coordinating union for the media and culture sector.

Return of DAG to DGB

DAG will be involved in the major union merger to create Ver.di (DE9911225F), and will also become reintegrated into DGB after 50 years of separation. Since DAG detached from DGB in 1948, it has been the only significant trade union organisation in Germany outside DGB.

The reintegration of DAG into DGB, however, has created some organisational problems, since DAG has members not only in sectors which will fall within the organisational responsibility of Ver.di but also in sectors covered by other unions, such as metalworking or chemicals. In order to solve these problems, all the unions involved have agreed on the following provisions:

  • all current members of DAG will automatically become members of Ver.di;

  • DAG will conclude special agreements (Geschäftsbesorgungsverträge) with other DGB affiliates to ensure that former DAG members are automatically covered by collective agreements in sectors which do not fall within the organisational responsibility of Ver.di; and

  • former DAG members should be included in the electoral registers of other DGB affiliates for the purposes of electing works and staff councils and employee representatives on supervisory boards in sectors which do not fall within the organisational responsibility of Ver.di.

Commentary

In recent years, German trade unions have entered a period of reorganisation which has led to a wave of mergers (DE9710233F). At the same time, Germany has seen ongoing structural changes in the economy which have broken down the traditional sectoral demarcations and led to the establishment of "new" sectors such as telecommunications or IT. Both developments have major implications for relations among unions and might raise the risk of encouraging competition between them.

The new DGB organisation agreement tries to give a first response to these developments by defining principles for the clarification of organisational responsibility between DGB affiliates. Thereby, DGB has taken a very important step in a very sensitive area. Some conflicts might, however, continue, in particular in those companies which do not clearly fit into the agreed guidelines.

Besides the limitation of trade union competition, there is also a need for more active cooperation between unions. The latter is most obvious in the newly established sectors where multi-unionism will continue to exist. If the unions stick to the German system of sectoral collective bargaining they will be forced to develop a joint approach for the creation of multi-employer agreements in these new sectors. (Thorsten Schulten, Institute for Economic and Social Research (WSI))

Eurofound recommends citing this publication in the following way.

Eurofound (2000), New agreement clarifies organisational responsibilities between DGB affiliates, article.

Flag of the European UnionThis website is an official website of the European Union.
How do I know?
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
The tripartite EU agency providing knowledge to assist in the development of better social, employment and work-related policies