Article

Study finds that 'education pays'

Published: 17 December 2003

On average, younger people in Finland today are better educated than older people - see table 1 below. At same time, structural changes in the economy have diminished the number of low-skill jobs and a low level of education can easily lead to long-term unemployment. Education is considered as the key to Finland's competitiveness and economic growth. The economic globalisation process especially has emphasised the importance of education and the supply of a highly-skilled labour force for a small open economy like Finland, which can not compete on low-skill jobs with the developing countries. It is thus an important question whether incentives in society encourage individual investment in a high level of education.

The question of whether it pays to study longer or is more profitable to enter the labour market at a young age is an important question in Finland, where income redistribution via the tax system and income transfers is strong, even if studying is mainly free of fees. Research published in November 2003 finds that education does pay, as the wage level rises and the risk of unemployment falls as the level of education increases. Lifelong earnings are higher for highly educated people than for those with a low level of education.

On average, younger people in Finland today are better educated than older people - see table 1 below. At same time, structural changes in the economy have diminished the number of low-skill jobs and a low level of education can easily lead to long-term unemployment. Education is considered as the key to Finland's competitiveness and economic growth. The economic globalisation process especially has emphasised the importance of education and the supply of a highly-skilled labour force for a small open economy like Finland, which can not compete on low-skill jobs with the developing countries. It is thus an important question whether incentives in society encourage individual investment in a high level of education.

Most studies on education as an individual investment have concentrated on gross wage differences between those with high and low level of education. However, there are many other factors that finally affect the 'rate of return' on education. Two economists at the Labour Institute of Economic Research (Palkansaajien tutkimuslaitos) (Roope Uusitalo and Ulla Hämäläinen) have studied the effects of education for individuals by taking into account not only the wage level but also the costs of education, income during education and the risk of unemployment after finishing studies. In their study, published in November 2003, they find that education pays on average very well in Finland, with estimates of the return on education varying from about 6% to 14%, depending on the factors that are taken into account. There are, however, differences between groups. The rate of return is lower for women than for men, regardless of the field of education.

Table 1. Level of education in two age groups in 2001 (% share of age group concerned)
Level of education Age 25-34 Age 55 and over
Basic 12.9 40.8
Secondary 44.6 27.8
Lower tertiary 30,2 21.5
Upper tertiary 12.3 9.8

Source: Government Institute for Economic Research.

Costs and income during studies

Education is in practice free of charge in Finland, as there are no tuition fees in universities. The main cost of studies consists of lost wage income during the years spent studying instead of working. However, most students receive subsidies from the government and they also work besides their studies and earn wage income. In fact, the income level of students is on average about two-thirds of the income level of their counterparts of the same age who are not studying but already working full time.

The system for financing studies is composed of grants and state guaranteed loans. The state study grant consists of a basic grant and a housing subsidy - see table 2 below. A university student receives a grant of EUR 259 per month, while the loan is EUR 220 per month. The grant can be paid for 12 months per year if the student studies for the whole year, including the summer. The maximum duration of a grant is 55 months per basic degree and up to 70 months in all. The study grant is subject to tax. The housing subsidy covers 80% of reasonable housing costs, so the subsidy can be up to EUR 172 per month.

Table 2. Study grant, monthly rates in EUR before taxes*
Status For secondary school students For higher education students
Married or with maintenance liabilities 213.60 259.01
Living alone, aged 18 and over 213.60 259.01
Living alone, aged under 18 84.09 126.14
Living with parent, aged 20 or over 63.91 105.96
Living with parent, aged under 20 21.86 38.68

* 'Higher education' refers to universities, polytechnics and continuing education centres of universities. The secondary level includes all other educational institutes. Some of the grants are subject to a parental income test and can be either bigger or smaller than the sums given.

Source: Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela).

The grant and the housing subsidy are just sufficient to cover normal living costs. However, many students take a part-time job, a study loan etc to improve their income. The Students Union of the University of Helsinki (Helsingin yliopiston ylioppilaskunta, HYY) published in August 2003 a survey on work done by students. It found that 64% of students at the university supplement their income by working during the academic year. The students' gross income is an average EUR 9,430 a year. There is however a major difference in the earnings of men and women. While male students earn an average EUR 823 a month, the female students earn an average of only EUR 608. Although most students work part-time to earn extra money, student grants are still the most important source of income for most students. About 78% of students receive grants, the maximum sum being EUR 259 a month. In addition there is a housing supplement of up to EUR 171.55 a month. Although the working possibilities for students in Helsinki are better than in many other parts of the country, 41% of students at the University of Helsinki are still classified as low-income. The share is just 5% in the whole population. The problem is that students are forced to go to work, but they can not work too much, as they might then lose some grants.

At present, the average time spent at university is seven years and the average age of obtaining a master’s degree is 28. This has raised much discussion in Finland, as the government is aiming to raise the labour participation and employment rates and believes that students should enter the labour market at a much younger age. Both restrictions and incentives have been suggested to make studies more effective. A working group at the Ministry of Finance proposed in March 2003 that students should no longer receive student grants, but state-guaranteed loans that would be linked to progress in studies. The size of the loan would reflect living expenses, and the interest expenses would be tax-deductible. The report concluded that the accumulation of a loan would encourage students to graduate faster and join the workforce. Another working group (at the Ministry of Education) proposed in December 2003 time limits for university studies. Tuition would continue to be free for full-time students studying for a degree. However, mandatory fees are planned for supplementary studies undertaken when a person is already at work.

Wage level and unemployment risk

When wage levels are estimated by age, gender and education, it turns out that the effect of education is about 6.6% on men’s wages and about 5.5% on women’s wages. These estimates are provided in a study conducted by the Government Institute for Economic Research (Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus) (by Jaakko Kiander, Outi Kröger and Antti Romppanen) - see figures 1 and 2 below. This same simple method has been used widely in studies all over the world during recent decades, and such figures are considered as the 'return of investment' on education.

Figure 1. Annual pay of women by age and education in Finland, 2001

Figure 1. Annual pay of women by age and education in Finland, 2001

Source: Government Institute for Economic Research.

Figure 2. Net income profiles of the high and low educated in Finland

Figure 2. Net income profiles of the high and low educated in Finland

Source: Government Institute for Economic Research

However, Roope Uusitalo and Ulla Hämäläinen state that these figures only show the effect of one additional year of education on the gross wage, not the whole rate of return of education as a whole. Because taxation and income transfers affect the outcome, it is better to look at the net income instead of gross wages only. As the well educated also tend to live longer and to stay longer in working life, this strengthens the income effect of education over the life cycle.

The strongly progressive nature of Finnish income taxation smooths out the effect. Furthermore, direct income transfers narrow the net income differences. Hämäläinen and Uusitalo found that, measured by net income differences, the rate of return on academic education is 14% in Finland. Figure 3 below indicates that net income is at first lower for those studying longer, but higher educated people catch up lower educated people in terms of accumulated income at the age of 33, and their life-long income then becomes considerably higher. The higher educated also tend to retire later and live longer than the lower educated.

Figure 3. Net income profiles of the high and low educated in Finland

Figure 3. Net income profiles of the high and low educated in Finland

Source: 'Koulutus kannattaa - laski sitä miten päin vain', Roope Uusitalo and Ulla Hämäläinen, in Talous ja Yhteiskunta No. 4/2003.

A smaller risk of unemployment is one of the economic incentives for higher education. The unemployment rate of people with a high level of education remained quite low even during the years of deep economic depression in Finland over 1992-6, while the unemployment rate of the lower educated rose as high as almost 22% - see table 3 below. When the differences in the risk of unemployment are taken into account, the rate of return on education rises as high as 17%. As the rate measured by wage differences alone is 6%, it seems that employment security is a very important element in the comparison.

Table 3. Unemployment rates by education in Finland, 1990-2001
. Basic level Secondary Lower tertiary Upper tertiary All
1990 4.3 3.3 1.3 0.6 3.2
1991 8.5 7.3 3.3 1.3 6.7
1992 14.6 13.1 6.6 2.9 11.8
1993 20.3 17.9 10.5 5.0 16.5
1994 21.7 17.8 10.7 4.5 16.7
1995 20.7 16.5 9.8 4.4 15.5
1996 20.2 15.5 9.4 3.8 14.6
1997 17.6 13.7 7.7 4.2 12.7
1998 16.1 12.2 7.2 3.0 11.4
1999 15.2 10.9 5.9 2.8 10.3
2000 14.8 10.4 5.6 3.2 9.8
2001 13.9 9.7 5.3 3.0 9.2

Source: Government Institute for Economic Research.

Commentary

The share of people with a higher education in the population has increased considerably within a few generations. The above analysis shows that the economic incentives for education are quite good in Finland. Education pays even when only the wage level is taken into account. When the lower risk of unemployment and income during studies are taken into account, the rate of return of investment in education looks considerable. In addition, there are also non-economic incentives such as social respect or interesting work that might also be very important reasons for studying.

A new problem, especially among higher educated women, is the difficulty of obtaining open-ended employment contracts (FI0310202F). Temporary work reduces the return on education, as unemployment risk rises and wage development is typically weaker than in open-ended jobs. There are also professions that require a long education but do not bring high salaries. Teachers are one such group and also a typically female-dominated profession. Doctors working for in public sector managed to raise their pay through a long strike in year 2001 (FI0108198F), and one reason for their success might have been a serious shortage of doctors, especially in provincial healthcare centres.

It seems clear that for women the return on education is not as high as for men at present. However, women are already in the majority in universities. It will be interesting to see how this fact affects both the wage level of women and the wage level of the highly educated in the future. When ageing of the population and especially the forthcoming retirement of major age cohorts lead to shortages of labour, this might lead to changes in the relative wages in society, if supply and demand play any role in wages. Furthermore, new wage formation systems in the public sector as well as outsourcing and privatisation might lead to changes in the rate of return on education, as at the moment there are many low paid women with a higher education working in the public sector. (Seija Parviainen, Labour Institute of Economic Research)

Eurofound recommends citing this publication in the following way.

Eurofound (2003), Study finds that 'education pays', article.

Flag of the European UnionThis website is an official website of the European Union.
How do I know?
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
The tripartite EU agency providing knowledge to assist in the development of better social, employment and work-related policies