Economic motives for migration of professionals to western Europe remain significant
Published: 16 August 2010
The study entitled ‘Risk of possible outflow of highly-qualified professionals from the Czech Republic to other countries’, financed by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of the Czech Republic (MoLSA [1]), was carried out by the Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs (Výzkumný ústav práce a sociálních věcí, RILSA [2]) between 2000 and 2007.[1] http://www.mpsv.cz/en/[2] http://www.vupsv.cz
Economic motives for professionals to migrate from the Czech Republic to selected western European countries (Austria, Germany, Ireland, UK) were analysed for 2000–2007. Despite the growth in the Czech economy, average salaries in western Europe stayed two to three times higher; the purchasing power parity of professionals’ salaries also remained higher. The motivation for migration became weaker, but differences in earnings continued to support the ‘brain drain’.
Background
The study entitled ‘Risk of possible outflow of highly-qualified professionals from the Czech Republic to other countries’, financed by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of the Czech Republic (MoLSA), was carried out by the Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs (Výzkumný ústav práce a sociálních věcí, RILSA) between 2000 and 2007.
The study presents an analysis of the economic motives for the migration of academically educated professionals from the Czech Republic and demonstrates that achieving a high salary is a major driver for the majority (80%–90%) of this group.
Countries considered attractive for Czech migrants were selected for the study – Austria and Germany for their geographical proximity, and Ireland and the United Kingdom (UK) for their open labour markets.
The analysis was carried out for four professions typical of the migration phenomenon:
medical doctors (International Standard Classification of Occupations, ISCO-88: 2221);
computer programmers (ISCO-88: 2132);
mechanical engineers (ISCO-88: 2145);
electronics engineers (ISCO-88: 2144).
Differences in earnings in comparison countries
Earnings levels in the Czech Republic and the countries chosen for comparison became closer between 2000 and 2007. The increase in average earnings in the Czech Republic was more dynamic, with the Czech koruna (CZK) strengthening against the currencies of the countries selected for comparison (by 28% against the euro and by 44% against the British pound (GBP)). However, differences in earnings remained significant despite the fact that relative price levels in the Czech Republic were growing faster.
The large differences in earnings remain when nominal average gross earnings are examined (Table 1); for example, in 2007 the average gross earnings in the UK were 5.4 times higher than in the Czech Republic. The differences in nominal net earnings, which reflect the levels of tax and insurance payments, are slightly lower, especially in the case of Austria and Germany.
This characteristic is significant particularly in the case of ‘commuting migration’ to neighbouring countries (Austria, Germany), when migrants work abroad but return daily or weekly to their country of origin, and where they spend most of their earnings. This type of labour migration is typical of craftspeople and workers with few qualifications, and exceptional for highly qualified professionals. The former group are therefore excluded from the analysis below.
| Year | Czech Republic | Austria | Germany | Ireland | UK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average monthly nominal gross earnings in CZK1,2 | 2000 | 13,694 | 88,214 | 110,713 | 66,712 | 121,353 |
| 20073 | 20,856 | 87,102 | 99,375 | 72,497 | 112,202 | |
| Earnings relation (CZK=1.00) | 2000 | 1.00 | 6.44 | 8.08 | 4.87 | 8.86 |
| 2007 | 1.00 | 4.18 | 4.76 | 3.48 | 5.38 | |
| Aggregate tax rate of average gross earnings4 | 2000 | 0.226 | 0.310 | 0.445 | 0.203 | 0.258 |
| 2007 | 0.229 | 0.335 | 0.428 | 0.139 | 0.270 | |
| Average monthly nominal net earnings in CZK5 | 2000 | 10,599 | 60,868 | 61,446 | 53,169 | 90,044 |
| 2007 | 16,080 | 57,923 | 56,842 | 62,420 | 81,907 | |
| Earnings relation (CZK=1.00) | 2000 | 1.000 | 5.74 | 5.80 | 5.02 | 8.50 |
| 2007 | 1.000 | 3.60 | 3.53 | 3.88 | 5.09 |
Notes:
1 Data for the Czech Republic obtained from MoLSA’s information system on average earnings (informační systém o průměrném výdělku). Data for the other countries obtained from the publications of two commercial agencies – Translitera, Mercer (Czech). See Baštýř, 2009, p. 9.
2 Earnings in € and GBP converted to CZK according to the annual average exchange rate given by Eurostat.
3 Data for 2007 are preliminary.
4 The indicator is a sum of insurance and tax payments taken from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development data (OECD, 2008 and 2009).
5 Average monthly nominal net earnings in CZK = average gross earnings in the national currency × exchange rate × (1 – aggregate tax rate of average gross earnings).
Source: Baštýř, 2009, p. 6
Earnings motivation of highly qualified workers
In the case of highly qualified professionals, the most frequent type of foreign labour migration is ‘temporary labour migration’ when workers return to the home country after a certain period of time, from several months to a few years. RILSA’s research shows that this migration is driven primarily by the demands of foreign employers. Such relationships are part of the primary labour market and do not show any signs of wage discrimination. The motivational criterion is the internationally comparable purchasing power parity of net earnings, which corresponds to the level of consumer prices and reflects the consumption which the migrant can afford in their new country.
According to data for 2004 and 2007 (Table 2), the purchasing power parity of earnings in the Czech Republic increased during this period and thus the earnings motivation to migrate to the compared countries fell. Nevertheless, differences persist in certain professions and countries.
The purchasing power parities of earnings were highest for all monitored professions in the UK, where professionals’ earnings were higher than in all the other countries; Ireland had the lowest earnings motivation. Medical doctors continued to have a substantial motivation for migration during the period studied; for example, the purchasing power parity of earnings for this profession was 3.35 times higher in the UK than in the Czech Republic in 2007 (Table 2). In the case of engineers, the net earning parity in 2007 was 40%–90% higher in the compared countries than in the Czech Republic, and more than double in the UK. However, there was no earnings motivation for migration by computer programmers.
| Medical doctors | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Country | 2004 | 2007 | |
| Average monthly nominal gross earnings in CZK1 | Czech Republic | 36,720 | 42,644 |
| Austria | 176,262 | 167,298 | |
| Germany | 185,733 | 170,846 | |
| Ireland | 137,036 | 131,407 | |
| UK | 254,404 | 260,281 | |
| Purchasing power parity of net earnings in CZK2 | Czech Republic | 26,806 | 31,224 |
| Austria | 57,948 | 65,249 | |
| Germany | 50,806 | 55,787 | |
| Ireland | 43,227 | 50,189 | |
| UK | 92,644 | 104,557 | |
| Relation of purchasing power parity of net earnings (CZK=1.00) | Czech Republic | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Austria | 2.16 | 2.09 | |
| Germany | 1.90 | 1.79 | |
| Ireland | 1.61 | 1.61 | |
| UK | 3.46 | 3.35 | |
| Computer programmers | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Country | 2004 | 2007 | |
| Average monthly nominal gross earnings in CZK1 | Czech Republic | 34,315 | 46,455 |
| Austria | 95,538 | 97,709 | |
| Germany | 110,630 | 101,040 | |
| Ireland | 80,952 | 85,186 | |
| UK | 120,437 | 125,801 | |
| Purchasing power parity of net earnings in CZK2 | Czech Republic | 25,050 | 33,440 |
| Austria | 34,283 | 40,333 | |
| Germany | 34,659 | 35,133 | |
| Ireland | 29,323 | 36,912 | |
| UK | 46,123 | 52,149 | |
| Relation of purchasing power parity of net earnings (CZK=1.00) | Czech Republic | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Austria | 1.37 | 1.21 | |
| Germany | 1.38 | 1.05 | |
| Ireland | 1.17 | 1.10 | |
| UK | 2.03 | 1.56 | |
| Mechanical engineers | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Country | 2006 | 2007 | |
| Average monthly nominal gross earnings in CZK1 | Czech Republic | 29,770 | 34,903 |
| Austria | 115,239 | 115,840 | |
| Germany | 144,573 | 143,467 | |
| Ireland | 115,239 | 118,809 | |
| UK | 139,299 | 142,160 | |
| Purchasing power parity of net earnings in CZK2 | Czech Republic | 21,673 | 25,130 |
| Austria | 46,768 | 47,818 | |
| Germany | 45,695 | 47,182 | |
| Ireland | 41,477 | 44,038 | |
| UK | 56,508 | 58,931 | |
| Relation of purchasing power parity of net earnings (CZK=1.00) | Czech Republic | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Austria | 2.16 | 1.90 | |
| Germany | 2.11 | 1.88 | |
| Ireland | 1.91 | 1.75 | |
| UK | 2.61 | 2.34 | |
| Electronics engineers | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Country | 2006 | 2007 | |
| Average monthly nominal gross earnings in CZK1 | Czech Republic | 39,360 | 41,803 |
| Austria | 115,975 | 116,562 | |
| Germany | 133,774 | 132,749 | |
| Ireland | 111,639 | 114,396 | |
| UK | 150,561 | 153,689 | |
| Purchasing power parity of net earnings in CZK2 | Czech Republic | 28,654 | 30,118 |
| Austria | 43,895 | 44,932 | |
| Germany | 42,282 | 43,658 | |
| Ireland | 40,181 | 42,661 | |
| UK | 57,902 | 60,480 | |
| Relation of purchasing power parity of net earnings (CZK=1.00) | Czech Republic | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Austria | 1.53 | 1.49 | |
| Germany | 1.48 | 1.45 | |
| Ireland | 1.40 | 1.42 | |
| UK | 2.02 | 2.01 | |
| National economy | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Country | 2004 | 2007 | |
| Average monthly nominal gross earnings in CZK1 | Czech Republic | 17,457 | 20,856 |
| Austria | 91,272 | 87,102 | |
| Germany | 108,843 | 99,375 | |
| Ireland | 73,828 | 72,497 | |
| UK | 114,742 | 112,202 | |
| Purchasing power parity of net earnings in CZK2 | Czech Republic | 13,302 | 16,080 |
| Austria | 35,611 | 35,955 | |
| Germany | 32,538 | 34,554 | |
| Ireland | 27,349 | 31,414 | |
| UK | 42,896 | 46,512 | |
| Relation of purchasing power parity of net earnings (CZK=1.00) | Czech Republic | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Austria | 2.68 | 2.24 | |
| Germany | 2.45 | 2.15 | |
| Ireland | 2.06 | 1.95 | |
| UK | 3.22 | 2.89 | |
Notes:
1 For data sources and conversion to CZK, see Table 1. Data for 2007 are preliminary.
2 Purchasing power parity of net earnings = average nominal net monthly earnings in CZK / relative price level based on the Eurostat database, recalculated CZK=1.00.
Source: Baštýř, 2009, p. 7
References
Baštýř, I. ‘Výdělkové motivace k migraci z ČR za prací do zahraničí se zaměřením na kvalifikované, terciárně vzdělané odborníky’ [Wage motivation to migrate from the Czech Republic to work abroad, focusing on qualified, tertiary educated specialists], in Fórum sociální politiky, 6/2009, Prague, Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs (RILSA), 2009.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Taxing wages 2006/2007, Paris, Luxembourg, OECD, 2008, available online at http://www.oecd.org/document/57/0,3343,en_2649_34533_40233913_1_1_1_1,00.html.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD, Taxing wages 2007/2008, Paris, Luxembourg, 2009, available online at http://www.oecd.org/document/6/0,3343,en_2649_34533_42714758_1_1_1_1,00.html.
Ivo Baštýř and Hana Geissler, Research Institute for Labour and Social Affairs (RILSA)
Eurofound recommends citing this publication in the following way.
Eurofound (2010), Economic motives for migration of professionals to western Europe remain significant, article.
All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodies&w=3840&q=75)


&w=3840&q=75)
&w=3840&q=75)
&w=3840&q=75)