From 5–18 May 2008, the latest round of social elections – also known as workplace elections –was held across the Belgian private sector. This is the 15th time that the elections have taken place since their introduction in 1950 (*BE0406301N* [1]). In terms of the gender distribution, the election results show a higher proportion of successful female candidates compared with the results four years ago (*BE0807029I* [2]).[1] www.eurofound.europa.eu/ef/observatories/eurwork/articles/social-elections-bring-little-change-in-union-support[2] www.eurofound.europa.eu/ef/observatories/eurwork/articles/women-win-seats-in-workplace-elections-but-remain-underrepresented
The 15th national social elections were held in Belgium in May 2008 to elect the country’s worker representatives to works councils and health and safety committees. Although the General Christian Trade Union remains by far the majority trade union confederation in Belgium, it experienced slight or very slight losses in a number of economic sectors and regions.
From 5–18 May 2008, the latest round of social elections – also known as workplace elections –was held across the Belgian private sector. This is the 15th time that the elections have taken place since their introduction in 1950 (BE0406301N). In terms of the gender distribution, the election results show a higher proportion of successful female candidates compared with the results four years ago (BE0807029I).
Background
In Belgium, the elections held by a company’s employees to elect members of the works council and the workplace health and safety committee are traditionally referred to as ‘social elections’. All private sector companies employing more than 100 employees are legally obliged to set up a works council and workplace health and safety committee (Comité pour la prévention et protection au travail/Comité voor preventie en bescherming op het werk, CPPT/CPBW), while enterprises with over 50 workers only have to establish the latter (BE0309304T). The social elections are held every four years in Belgium and are regulated by detailed legislation, which is similar in many respects to the rules governing municipal elections.
Significant features of the elections include: separate electoral bodies for blue-collar and white-collar workers, and professional and managerial staff (kaderleden/cadres); the exclusion of employees classified as senior executives from participation in the elections; and restriction of the right to nominate candidates to the most representative trade unions, except in the case of professional and managerial staff, where independent candidates are also permitted.
Main election results
The 15th round of social elections did not result in any fundamental changes in the balance of power between Belgium’s three main trade union confederations – the General Christian Trade Union (Algemeen Christelijk Vakverbond/Confédération des syndicats chrétiens, ACV/CSC), the Belgian General Confederation of Labour (Algemeen Belgisch Vakverbond/ Fédération Générale du Travail de Belgique, ABVV/FGTB) and the Federation of Liberal Trade Unions of Belgium (Algemene Centrale der Liberale Vakbonden van België/Centrale Générale des Syndicats Libéraux de Belgique, ACLVB/CGSLB). At national level, the Christian ACV/CSC retained its dominant position, securing almost 57% of the seats on works councils and just over 59% of the seats on the CPPT/CPBWs (Table 1). The socialist ABVV/FGTB is equally represented in both representative bodies, with just over one third of the seats. Meanwhile, the liberal ACLVB/CGSLB increased its number of seats on both the works councils (6.6%) and CPPT/CPBWs (6.2%).
Table 1 below compares the results of both the 2008 and 2004 elections for the main trade union confederations in terms of votes and seats for the works council and CPPT/CPBW elections.
| Votes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPPT/CPBWs | Works councils | |||
| 2004 | 2008 | 2004 | 2008 | |
| ABVV/FGTB | 36.3 | 36.7 | 35.8 | 36.2 |
| ACV/CSC | 53.8 | 53.4 | 52.3 | 52.4 |
| ACLVB/CGSLB | 9.9 | 9.8 | 9.5 | 9.7 |
| Alternative managerial staff lists* | -- | -- | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Seats | ||||
| CPPT/CPBWs | Works councils | |||
| 2004 | 2008 | 2004 | 2008 | |
| ABVV/FGTB | 34.2 | 34.5 | 34.1 | 34.8 |
| ACV/CSC | 60.0 | 59.3 | 57.3 | 56.8 |
| ACLVB/CGSLB | 5.8 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Alternative managerial staff lists* | -- | -- | 2.5 | 1.8 |
* Alternative managerial staff lists (National Confederation of Managerial Staff ( Confédération Nationale des Cadres_/Nationale Confederatie voor Kaderleden, CNC/NCK) or autonomous company groups) are only allowed in works council elections._
Source: Federal Ministry of Employment, Labour and Social Dialogue (Federale Overheidsdienst Werkgelegenheid, Arbeid en Sociaal Overleg/Service public fédéral Emploi, Travail et Concertation sociale, FOD/WASO)
Comparing the 2008 results with those for 2004, a slight loss can be detected for the largest trade union confederation, ACV/CSC. The negative trend in election results for the alternative lists for managerial staff has also been prolonged.
Elections in private sector
Social elections are organised in the private sector. This sector includes the so-called ‘not-for-profit sector’, which encompasses organisations and institutions involved in healthcare, social work and cultural activities. Due to the historic segregation (pilarisation/verzuiling) of Belgian society, this sector is dominated by Christian-based organisations, with ACV-CSC therefore having a significant advantage.
Table 2 shows the results for the sector’s private industries and services, excluding the not-for-profit private sector.
| Votes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPPT/CPBWs | Works councils | |||
| 2004 | 2008 | 2004 | 2008 | |
| ABVV/FGTB | 39.4 | 40.1 | 38.7 | 39.8 |
| ACV/CSC | 49.7 | 49.1 | 48.0 | 47.6 |
| ACLVB/CGSLB | 10.9 | 10.8 | 10.3 | 10.5 |
| Alternative managerial staff lists* | -- | -- | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Seats | ||||
| CPPT/CPBWs | Works councils | |||
| 2004 | 2008 | 2004 | 2008 | |
| ABVV/FGTB | 39.4 | 39.6 | 37.9 | 38.6 |
| ACV/CSC | 53.7 | 53.1 | 52.1 | 51.6 |
| ACLVB/CGSLB | 6.9 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 7.5 |
| Alternative managerial staff lists* | -- | -- | 3.1 | 2.3 |
* Alternative managerial staff lists (CNC/NCK or autonomous company groups) are only allowed in works council elections.
Source: FOD/WASO
The majority position of ACV/CSC is still clear, albeit less prominent and with slight losses also evident in this case.
Election results by region
It is worthwhile comparing the results according to region. Traditionally, ABVV/FGTB has maintained a much stronger presence in the Walloon and Brussels regions, while ACV/CSC has dominated the Flanders region – as is confirmed by these latest results. Table 3 presents the results in relation to works council seats by region.
| Total seats | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flanders | Wallonia | Brussels | ||||
| 2004 | 2008 | 2004 | 2008 | 2004 | 2008 | |
| ABVV/FGTB | 29.3 | 30.8 | 42.0 | 42.0 | 38.6 | 38.0 |
| ACV/CSC | 63.2 | 61.4 | 51.9 | 51.9 | 46.8 | 49.1 |
| ACLVB/CGSLB | 5.9 | 6.6 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Alternative managerial staff lists* | 1.6 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 3.4 |
| Seats in private for-profit sector | ||||||
| Flanders | Wallonia | Brussels | ||||
| 2004 | 2008 | 2004 | 2008 | 2004 | 2008 | |
| ABVV/FGTB | 33.2 | 34.5 | 50.6 | 50.4 | 39.1 | 39.4 |
| ACV/CSC | 58.3 | 56.5 | 41.9 | 42.5 | 44.4 | 45.7 |
| ACLVB/CGSLB | 6.7 | 7.5 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 10.3 | 10.4 |
| Alternative managerial staff lists* | 1.9 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 6.3 | 4.5 |
* Alternative managerial staff lists (CNC/NCK or autonomous company groups) are only allowed in works council elections.
Source: FOD/WASO
In general, ACV/CSC’s presence is much stronger in the Flanders region than in the other regions. However, the confederation also has the strongest presence in the French-speaking parts of the country, as well as slightly improving its position in such parts. When considering only the private industry and services sector, thus excluding the not-for-profit sector, the situation changes. The socialist ABVV/FGTB retains the strongest presence in the Walloon region, although once again ACV/CSC’s position has slightly improved in this region, and in terms of overall seats it has not recorded a loss.
Commentary
After the elections – and as seems to be the customary practice in the political system – all of the trade union organisations claim to have won. Nevertheless, it appears that the socialist union ABVV-FGTB has, in particular, regained its confidence in terms of an increased, albeit marginal, number of votes and seats.
Guy Van Gyes, Higher Institute for Labour Studies (HIVA), Catholic University of Leuven
Il-Eurofound jirrakkomanda li din il-pubblikazzjoni tiġi kkwotata kif ġej.
Eurofound (2009), Results of 2008 social elections in private sector, article.