Šī lapa pašlaik nav pilnībā pieejama izvēlētajā valodā. Lūdzu, nomainiet uz angļu valodas versiju vai iepazīstieties ar Eurofound valodu politiku.
Raksts

Collective bargaining coverage continues to decline

Publicēts: 29 January 2002

According to a study published in December 2001, based on data provided by the establishment panel of the Institute for Employment Research (Institut for Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung, IAB), the decline of collective bargaining coverage (DE9712140F [1]) continued in 2000 (Tarifverträge – nein danke!? Einflussfaktoren der Tarifbindung west- und ostdeutscher BetriebeSusanne Kohaut and Claus Schnabel, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 2001 [2]). The study also finds that in west Germany 70.1% of all employees are still covered by some kind of collective agreement, while in east Germany coverage is much lower, at 55.4% in 2000.[1] www.eurofound.europa.eu/ef/observatories/eurwork/articles/undefined/collective-bargaining-coverage-in-western-germany[2] http://www.wiso.uni-erlangen.de/WiSo/VWI/am/pdf/dp8.pdf

A study published in December 2001, based on establishment-level data for 2000, found that a declining share of German companies are covered by industry-wide collective agreements. Although there is still a significant number of companies which voluntarily apply the terms of collective agreements, without being legally bound by them, the speed of decline of bargaining coverage is increasing. While larger companies and their subsidiaries are more inclined to be covered, smaller, unincorporated and newly-established firms tend to fall outside industry-wide collective agreements.

According to a study published in December 2001, based on data provided by the establishment panel of the Institute for Employment Research (Institut for Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung, IAB), the decline of collective bargaining coverage (DE9712140F) continued in 2000 (Tarifverträge – nein danke!? Einflussfaktoren der Tarifbindung west- und ostdeutscher BetriebeSusanne Kohaut and Claus Schnabel, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 2001). The study also finds that in west Germany 70.1% of all employees are still covered by some kind of collective agreement, while in east Germany coverage is much lower, at 55.4% in 2000.

No clear trend towards company-level agreements

German collective bargaining is relatively centralised and takes place mainly at the national or regional level, where trade unions and employers' associations negotiate sectoral collective agreements for an entire industry or trade. Trade unions, however, may also conclude collective agreements with individual employers (company agreement s). Both types of agreements are binding for all negotiating parties.

The new study indicates that industry-level collective agreements covered 45.4% of establishments (62.8% of employees) in west Germany in 2000, and 23.2% of establishments (45.5% of employees) in west Germany - see table 1 below.

Data provided by the Ministry of Labour indicate that since 1990 the total number of companies with company-level agreements has increased steadily from 2,550 in 1990 (DE9902196F) to 6,415 in December 2000. The share of the labour force which is covered by such agreements, however, does not follow this growth pattern. As shown in table 1 below, only 7.3% of all employees in west Germany and 9.9% in east Germany were subject to a company agreement in 2000, which was below the level of the previous year.

The survey data also reveal a great discrepancy between the share of companies covered by an industry- or company-level agreement.and the percentage of employees who are subject to the provisions of such agreements, with the latter considerably higher than the former. This is very much in line with findings from previous years that bargaining coverage tends to rise along with company size. While large firms are more inclined to be party to a collective agreement, small and medium-sized firms tend rather to determine wages, hours and working conditions through different mechanisms.

However, this does not necessarily mean that terms and conditions are negotiated on an individual basis between management and employees in such cases. The new survey finds that 39.1% of west German companies and 42.8% of east Germany companies not covered by a collective agreement still use the standards set by collective bargaining as a point of reference. In terms of employee numbers, this means that 49.3% of workers in west German companies not covered by collective agreements, and 53.8% of workers in such east German companies, enjoy the benefits of most of the standards set by collective bargaining, even though they are not legally covered by an agreement.

In sectoral terms, companies' industry-level bargaining coverage in west Germany was highest in the public sector, construction, and mining/energy and lowest in company-related services and agriculture. In east Germany, coverage was highest in the public sector, banking/insurance and in mining/energy, and lowest in transport/media and company-related services.

Table 1: Collective bargaining coverage in Germany, 2000 (%)
Industry Establishments (employees) covered by industry-wide collective agreement Establishments (employees) covered by company-level collective agreement Establishments (employees) without collective agreement
. West East West East West East
Agriculture 35.1 (43.4) 17.5 (27.7) 5.1 (7.1) 1.5 (4.9) 59.9 (49.6) 80.9 (67.5)
Mining/energy 67.9 (80.1) 52.6 (79.8) 9.4 (16.3) 19.4 (13.3) 22.8 (3.7) 28.0 (6.9)
Basic material processing 49.0 (73.6) 23.3 (41.8) 3.2 (6.0) 4.4 (9.7) 47.8 (20.3) 72.4 (48.5)
Investment goods industry 41.7 (65.7) 16.8 (35.1) 2.6 (6.7) 5.6 (9.8) 55.7 (27.6) 77.6 (55.0)
Consumer non-durables industry 53.1 (64.4) 22.5 (31.1) 1.8 (5.4) 8.3 (13.7) 45.0 (30.2) 69.2 (55.2)
Construction 70.1 (81.4) 34.6 (43.5) 1.9 (2.9) 4.6 (7.0) 28.0 (15.7) 60.9 (49.5)
Trade, commerce 52.1 (64.6) 19.9 (36.7) 2.2 (4.5) 2.6 (5.6) 45.7 (31.0) 77.6 (57.8)
Transport, media 39.8 (55.7) 13.6 (25.8) 4.0 (17.2) 7.7 (32.5) 56.2 (27.1) 78.8 (41.7)
Banking, insurance 64.6 (87.8) 51.6 (89.9) 2.3 (5.4) 7.7 (2.3) 33.1 (6.8) 40.7 (7.7)
Company-related services 15.5 (33.3) 14.2 (35.5) 1.6 (7.4) 3.0 (6.9) 82.9 (59.3) 82.7 (57.5))
Services, other 44.5 (59.0) 19.6 (42.7) 2.8 (7.2) 4.1 (11.6) 52.7 (33.7) 76.3 (45.7)
Public sector 82.9 (83.1) 83.0 (92.0) 9.7 (12.0) 10.1 (6.3) 7.3 (4.8) 6.9 (1.7)
Total 45.4 (62.8) 23.2 (45.5) 2.7 (7.3) 4.3 (9.9) 51.9 (29.9) 72.5 (44.6)

Source: IAB Establishment Panel.

Medium-term developments

Table 2 below indicates the development of west and east German industry-level collective bargaining coverage rates between 1995 and 2000. Over this period, coverage declined by 9.4 percentage points in west and 10.8 points in east Germany. With coverage rates in west Germany still far above the 50% level, industry-wide collective agreements evidently still have the power to regulate wages and working conditions for the majority of employees. What is striking, however, is that decline seems to have picked up speed between 1998 and 2000.

Table 2 Employees covered by an industry-wide agreement 1995-2000 (%)
. West Germany East Germany
1995 72.2 N/A
1996 69.2 56.3
1998 67.8 50.5
2000 62.8 45.5

Source: IAB Establishment Panel.

Factors explaining variations

In addition to company size, there are several other variables which affect collective bargaining coverage. Based on a regression analysis of data from the IAB Establishment Panel, which includes 14,000 companies, the authors of the new study also found that larger companies and their subsidiaries tend to be covered by an industry-wide agreement. Smaller and younger companies, founded after 1995, have a significantly lower coverage rate. Company ownership is also significant. While unincorporated firms have a lower tendency to be bound by the terms of collective agreements, the nationality of the owners has ambivalent effects. In west Germany, foreign-owned companies have a lower bargaining coverage, but this effect is reversed in the east where coverage is positively associated with foreign ownership. Finally, in all parts of the country there is a positive relationship between collective bargaining coverage and the proportion of skilled employees working for a company.

Commentary

To some extent, the new data on collective bargaining coverage reveal what researchers in the field of comparative industrial relations have hypothesised for many years: the German system of industrial relations experiences incremental change but has strong checks and balances which protect trade unions, employers and the state from more rapid and fundamental change. Indeed, with the notable exception of eastern Germany, a majority of the workforce is still covered by industry-wide collective bargaining and even many of those companies which choose not to be party to an agreement cannot afford to stand on the sidelines. Thus, many of them apply collectively agreed standards voluntarily.

There are, however, major reasons for concern. First of all, because it is mostly new start-ups and foreign-owned companies (at least in west Germany) which refrain from participation in collective bargaining, this tends to remove new, growth industries from coverage by collective agreements. Second, the process of erosion of bargaining coverage has picked up speed lately and there is not much time left before collective agreements will apply to a minority of workers only. While researchers have made some progress in explaining the reasons for decline, there is still not a visible strategy which would help unions and employers' associations to reverse the trend. After years of moderate wage increases, however, there seems to be one safe bet: wage restraint and flexibilisation alone will not do the job. (Martin Behrens, Institute for Economic and Social Research, WSI)

Eurofound iesaka šo publikāciju citēt šādi.

Eurofound (2002), Collective bargaining coverage continues to decline, article.

Flag of the European UnionThis website is an official website of the European Union.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
The tripartite EU agency providing knowledge to assist in the development of better social, employment and work-related policies