Industrial relations and social dialogue

Darbo santykių tendencijos 2015–2019 m.

Flagship report
Atnaujinta
15 Gruodis 2020
Paskelbtas
11 Gruodis 2020
pdf
Formats and languages
Executive summary in 22 languages
Atsisiųsti

Pagrindinės išvados

  • Europos lygmeniu parengta iš tiesų nemažai Europos socialiniu dialogu pagrįstų bendrų iniciatyvų, tačiau susitarimų sudaryta nedaug.
Read more
  • Europos lygmeniu parengta iš tiesų nemažai Europos socialiniu dialogu pagrįstų bendrų iniciatyvų, tačiau susitarimų sudaryta nedaug.
  • Kai kuriuose sektoriuose reiškiamas susirūpinimas dėl atmestų socialinių partnerių prašymų įgyvendinti jų susitarimus pasitelkiant Europos teisės aktus, taip pat dėl poreikio gerinti ES ir nacionalinio lygmenų ryšius.
  • Nacionaliniu lygmeniu darbo santykiai ES tebėra labai įvairūs. Iš EUROFOUND analizės galima daryti išvadą, kad esama aiškaus pasidalijimo tarp šalių (šiaurinės ir žemyninės Europos dalies), kuriose demokratinių darbo santykių rodikliai yra geriausi, ir pietinių, liberalių, taip pat Vidurio ir Rytų Europos valstybių narių.
  • Mažiau nei vienoje iš trijų (29 proc.) ES esančių darboviečių (turinčių 10 ar daugiau darbuotojų) veikia tam tikri darbuotojų atstovavimo organai. Teisiniai reikalavimai yra esminė tokio atstovavimo didinimo priemonė.
  • Investavimas į socialinį dialogą pakilimo laikotarpiu padeda užtikrinti galimybes juo remtis ištikus krizei. Iš pirmosios politinio atsako į COVID-19 pandemiją peržiūros matyti, kad socialinių partnerių dalyvavimas iš esmės aktyvesnis buvo tose šalyse, kuriose socialiniam dialogui paprastai buvo teikiama didesnė reikšmė.
Read less

Įžanga

Atsižvelgdamas į savo įgaliojimus, susijusius su vadovų ir darbuotojų socialinio dialogo skatinimu, EUROFOUND ilgiau nei 40 metų stebėjo ir analizavo darbo santykių sistemų tendencijas ES lygmeniu ir ES valstybėse narėse. Ši ataskaita apie pavyzdinę iniciatyvą grindžiama darbu, kuris šiomis aplinRead more

Atsižvelgdamas į savo įgaliojimus, susijusius su vadovų ir darbuotojų socialinio dialogo skatinimu, EUROFOUND ilgiau nei 40 metų stebėjo ir analizavo darbo santykių sistemų tendencijas ES lygmeniu ir ES valstybėse narėse. Ši ataskaita apie pavyzdinę iniciatyvą grindžiama darbu, kuris šiomis aplinkybėmis buvo nuveiktas per paskutinį programavimo laikotarpį (2015–2019 m.). Joje remiamasi plataus masto darbo santykių sistemų ir socialinio dialogo stebėsenos, kurią nuolat vykdė EUROFOUND, rezultatais. Bendra ataskaitos paskirtis – padėti politikos formuotojams ir darbo santykių subjektams suprasti problemas, susijusias su socialiniu dialogu, ir išsiaiškinti, kaip būtų galima prisidėti prie suderintų ir gerai veikiančių darbo santykių sistemų.

Read less

Formats and languages

  • Ataskaita

    Puslapių skaičius: 
    120
    Nuorodos Nr.: 
    EF20023
    ISBN: 
    978-92-897-2137-0
    Katalogo Nr.: 
    TJ-06-20-066-EN-N
    DOI: 
    10.2806/994718
    Catalogue info

    Darbo santykių tendencijos 2015–2019 m.

    Formatai

    Cita questa pubblicazione: 

    Eurofound (2020), Industrial relations: Developments 2015–2019, Challenges and prospects in the EU series, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

  • Executive summary

    Nuorodos Nr.: 
    EF20023EN1
    Catalogue info

    Darbo santykių tendencijos 2015–2019 m.

    Autorius (-ai): 
    Eurofound

    Galima parsisiųsti 22 kalbomis

    Atsisiųsti
  • Tables and graphs

    List of tables

    Table 1: Main EU cross-sectoral joint texts, November 2014–November 2019
    Table 2: European Pillar of Social Rights
    Table 3: Results of the mapping exercise on capacity gaps and needs among national social partners
    Table 4: Social partners’ involvement in social and labour policymaking
    Table 5: Recitals with explicit references to capacity building in the 2019 CSRs
    Table 6: Contextual indicators for industrial democracy
    Table 7: Dimensions and indicators of industrial democracy
    Table 8: Industrial democracy clusters in the EU27 and the UK, 2008–2012 and 2013–2017
    Table 9: Selected developments in social partner organisations, 2014–2019
    Table 10: Member States in which respondents were most and least likely to have received training as an employee representative
    Table 11: Employee representatives perceiving levels of appreciation from employees by industrial democracy cluster (%)
    Table 12: Direct and indirect forms of employee involvement in the most important organisational change
    Table 13: Views of management and employee representatives on the degree of influence of employees and their representatives
    Table 14: Extent of mutual trust between employee representatives and management (%)
    Table A1: Types of employee representatives included in the ECS 2019

    List of figures

    Figure 1: European social dialogue outcomes by type of text (as at 29 July 2020)
    Figure 2: National social partners’ involvement in peak-level social dialogue in 2018
    Figure 3: Trade union density rates by industrial democracy cluster, 2000, 2014 and 2018 (%)
    Figure 4: Collective bargaining coverage rates by industrial democracy cluster, 2000, 2014 and 2018 (%)
    Figure 5: Private sector collective bargaining coverage and patterns by industrial democracy cluster, 2019 (%)
    Figure 6: Prevalence and type of workplace-level employee representation by country and industrial democracy cluster (%)
    Figure 7: Proportion of employees covered by official employee representation by industrial democracy cluster
    Figure 8: Proportion of companies in the ECS to which certain legal rules and size thresholds on employee representation apply
    Figure 9: Probability that any form of employee representation will exist in an establishment by establishment size and sector (%)
    Figure 10: Influence of legal rules and thresholds on probability of representation (%)
    Figure 11: Influence of company employment developments, competitiveness and workforce structure on probability of representation (%)
    Figure 12: Years of experience as an employee representative by gender (%)
    Figure 13: Proportion of respondents by type of representation and establishment size
    Figure 14: Working time available to employee representatives by industrial democracy cluster (%)
    Figure 15: Training for employee representatives by type and establishment size (%)
    Figure 16: Access of employee representatives to funding for external advice by type of representation and establishment size (%)
    Figure 17: Proportion of employee representatives reporting estimated shares of trade union membership in their establishments (%)
    Figure 18: Employee representatives meeting with employees during and outside working hours (%)
    Figure 19: Existence and use of a dedicated social media account to communicate with employees by length of experience of the employee representative (%)
    Figure 20: Employee representatives receiving information (financial, employment and strategic) from management by industrial democracy cluster (%)
    Figure 21: Employee representatives expressing satisfaction with the quality of information and reporting receiving it in good time (%)
    Figure 22: Employee representatives’ involvement in various types of pay negotiations (%)
    Figure 23: Employee representatives’ involvement in pay negotiations by industrial democracy cluster (%)
    Figure 24: Employee representatives’ involvement in pay negotiations by type of representation (%)
    Figure 25: Employee representatives reporting organisational changes since 2016 (%)
    Figure 26: Areas of most important change since 2016, as reported by employee representatives (%)
    Figure 27: Involvement of employee representatives in the most important organisational change by industrial democracy cluster (%)
    Figure 28: Initiator and form of social dialogue (%)
    Figure 29: Forms of indirect and direct employee involvement in the most important organisational change (%)
    Figure 30: Distribution of combinations of direct and indirect employee involvement by type of employee representation (%)
    Figure 31: Employee representatives’ views on direct involvement of employees (%)
    Figure 32: Employee representatives’ views on influence of representatives and employees on major organisational changes (%)
    Figure 33: Employee representatives’ views on great or moderate influence of employees and representatives on organisational change by area (%)
    Figure 34: Employee representatives’ views on levels of trust in management and whether management listens (%)
    Figure 35: Trust in and relationship with management by frequency of meeting (%)

This report presents the results of research conducted largely prior to the outbreak of COVID-19 in Europe in February 2020. For this reason, the results do not fully take account of the outbreak.

Moksliniuose tyrimuose, kurie buvo atlikti iki JK išstojimo iš Europos Sąjungos 2020 m. sausio 31 d. ir vėliau paskelbti, gali būti pateikiami su 28 ES valstybėmis narėmis susiję duomenys. Po šios datos, jei nenurodyta kitaip, tyrimuose remiamasi tik 27 ES valstybių narių (28 ES šalių be JK) duomenimis.

Part of the series

  • Challenges and prospects in the EU

    Eurofound’s Flagship report series 'Challenges and prospects in the EU' comprise research reports that contain the key results of multiannual research activities and incorporate findings from different related research projects. Flagship reports are the major output of each of Eurofound’s strategic areas of intervention and have as their objective to contribute to current policy debates.

Useful? Interesting? Tell us what you think. Hide comments

Komentuoti